Samaw.com

Comment from Sandman
Time: September 9, 2008, 10:03 pm

lolzzzzz!

Comment from Marapasaw Dopa
Time: September 10, 2008, 4:18 pm

And there are boys too in the picture!

Comment from Duhawma
Time: January 29, 2009, 4:30 am

the person deserves a good thrashing lolz… but seriously

Comment from Mr. Sangpa pachuau
Time: April 3, 2009, 9:25 am

Iam Bangladesh. 18 years old. my culture is BAWM ZO. first I love my country and also love to my culture. the world can be destryed but i no never forget my culture. so every people want to yourself love culture. thaks

Comment from Asish
Time: May 15, 2009, 10:13 pm

Hello Friends, I am Asish from Bangladesh. We have few Mizo people in the Hill Tracts of bangladesh. But they are much different from the predominant Chakma community in terms of culture and language. But the origin seems to be the same. My question is at what point in time the people got seperated? How about the differences of language? What is the link between these two communities? The mizo people living in Bangladesh are simlar to those who live in Mizoram? Lusai, bawm, Pankhoa and Mizo are they same?

Comment from martin
Time: May 16, 2009, 12:10 pm

Dear Asish,

We are all the same. lusei, bawm, pahkhao and lusie. One big family got separated years ago. so languages and tone became a bit distinct but the basic are still the same. Example, Zo ( national Identity) in some parts is not even clear YO or Zo and in some parts Cho or Sho. just one big family.

We are well connected to once a influential nation in Burma which is PHYU. after it collasped might have been the start of migration to places now. Ater the phyu collapsed Burman became the main group swallowing the remanding Phyu (zo) groups example are seen now in Plain Zo known as A- SHO.

we don’t have common language and to say it more correctly some of us don’t want common language because they fear other family might dominate them. but what they don’t want to know is that won’t help anyone not even themselves. UNITY is everything.

Mr. Sangpa pachua said it well. Bawm Zo. We must give credit to our ancestral in naming Zo at the back of our family name and naming zo to settlements. That reminds us which we are from. Just like it is common to find Zo terms in Zo names. Zotlang,Zokhua,BawmZo, LaiZo, A-SHO, Cho, Mro(masho) and so many others.

offcourse there are always a few elders from a few families would argue for another slavery terms such as Kuki or Chin.

cheers
martin

Comment from Steven
Time: May 17, 2009, 6:04 am

Hi Asish, You are right, Chakmas and Mizos are different. Chakmas are the predominant tribals in Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) while Mizos are the predominant tribe in Mizoram.

Lusai/Lusei/Lushais are Lusei (Mizo) speaking people who form about 70% of Mizoram population. Those Luseis in Bangladesh speak this language as well.

Bawm are Lai tribe, one of the big tribe of Chin people in Myanmar Chin State. Pankhua/Pankhoa too are one of the tribes.

You have asked, “The mizo people living in Bangladesh are simlar to those who live in Mizoram? Lusai, bawm, Pankhoa and Mizo are they same?”

This will depend on how we define Mizo, Kuki-Chin-Mizo people who live in CHT(Bangladesh) -Mizoram- Manipur -Chin State (Myanmar) believe they share a common root in the past, however, currently they are all speaking their own languages.

Mizos are the name used by Lusei speaking people, while Chin is the most common word used by the same people in Myanmar, likewise Kuki is the word used by the same people in Manipur, these people form majority where they live, the smaller ones like Sizang, Zo, Zomi, Mara, Senthang, Zotung, Zophei, Asho, K’Cho, Vaphei, Paite, Lautu, etc may not call themselves as Mizo, or Kuki, likewise Lais who are one of the biggest groups among the same people do not call themselves Mizo or Zomi.

However, not being able to agree on one name for Kuki-Chin-Mizo people is mostly due to different languages spoken by these people. Some of them are too different that they cannot understand each other.

There are some intellectuals who believe that we must have Unity based on mutual respect for all groupings within Kuki-Chin-Mizo.

Likewise, one like Martin is promoting Zo as the common name for these Kuki-Chin-Mizo people. However, Zo is the name used only by few of the mentioned people.

As far as I am concern, I believe that more than promoting one name and trying to push that name in the throat of our brothers, it will be more significant to have more dialogues and communication, cultural exchanges, etc, and helping one another when we face problem. Some guys keep speaking about unity and for everyone to use the word one common name, meanwhile they don’t care when our brothers in Manipur are being chased by Naga militants, no Chin leaders, Mizo leaders protested. Our Kuki (Thadou) brothers had to take up arms to defend themselves from other militants in Manipur. It is shame for us to speak about unity when we have no sympathy for them when they really need our help. Something like this keeps happening…

And to set the record straight, Chakmas are different from these Kuki-Chin-Mizo people.

Bangladesh Lusei who form the core of Mizo, Bawm part of Lai in Chin State and South Mizoram, Pankhoa in Bangladesh are different from Chakmas. These non-Chakma group you’ve mentioned are part of Kuki-Chin-Mizo, they may claim as one of the groupings within this bigger groups. And they will be mostly Christians too like their counterparts in India and Myanmar.

@martin, we can’t stop you promoting Zo, but it is not an acceptable term to many of our people. More than name, what is more important is how we care for one another. If we are brothers, we must care each other fairly. If we look at the unfairness being practiced by one or the other, even brothers will live like enemies. Be careful…

Comment from martin
Time: May 20, 2009, 6:15 am

Dear Steven,

Hakha or Lai always trying to divide things. history will remember you. you are making history now

cheers
martin

Comment from martin
Time: May 20, 2009, 6:19 am

Dear Steven,

congratulations for sharing what EXITS only in YOUR HEAD.

Laimi or Liemi ? which is more appropiate ?

cheers
martin

Comment from Steven
Time: May 20, 2009, 7:14 am

Dear Martin, first of all Lais are Lai, Laimi or Liemi whatever, I AM NOT a Laimi, Lai nor Zo or Zomi. in Chin State there are many people other than Zo, Zomis and Lai or Laimis. Do you know any of them?

Comment from martin
Time: May 20, 2009, 10:05 am

Dear Steven,

Don’t be so childish. Laimi should change to L I E ME . go lie yourself cheap.

Hakha now has less dominance over their surrounding families such as Zokhua,zotung,zophei and so many others. Look in Yangon, they got separate churches, such as Matu Baptist, Zotung, Zophei, Cho, and so on. Do you see any Lai ? yep there is hakha and thantlang. Dear kiddo plz keep your BIG LAI thing in your head. Practical facts doesn’t go with your head.

Nowadays these families has gain more and more acess to education and are really going up the ladder. Falam, Matu, and many others don’t claim themselves to be Lai anymore. you would see Falam Baptist church not lai.

I have got heaps of southern Hakha friends. They tell me they are not lai. History cleary states that the hakha residents even call their southerns Zo. now they want to change? Hakha elders are very cheap. they would literally EAT SHIT to gain anything. THEY WOULD LIE everyone on anything. CHEAP

Wha’t wrong with ur head ??

May be in your head they do and Lian mung and also Lian Uk. Maybe in their Heads.

GO ASK A zotung, zophei, many families in Falam, Matu, Lautu, senthang and many others whether u are lai or not. They will say lai term is for hakha and thangtlang and NOT US. off course they area always a few peolple strayed away from their main family and siding with Lais but again these are a few people.

A ngawn guy once argued to me that all Falam are lai (which is not true) i told him go ask your father whether he is a ZO or a Lai. That guy smiled and said nth. He was one of the Youth leaders of Falam Town. He affilation with Falam made him Lai.
he later told me that city boundaries are shit.

artificial boundaries of Falam. Go ask a regular Ngawn, what wil he say. I tell you he will say city boundaries are full of shit and we are more Zo than lai. GOT THAT?? go ask one now.

and i even read an article (forgot now) a Bawm Zo saying that he is not Lai but a family from larger ZO national.

you are one lousy ignorant and arrogant hakha

cheers
martin

Comment from Steven
Time: May 20, 2009, 5:35 pm

Dear a wanna be smart guy Martin,

You haven’t read the line carefully. This website is run by Maras, who don’t claim to be Lai nor Zo, forget about Zotung, Zophei, what about Senthang, K’Cho, Lautu, Asho, etc. I do not support the Zomi root claim nor Laimi root claim of being the generic name for all. From the beginning our people were diverse and we do not have a common name to cover the whole family. You are talking about Zophei, Zotung to be part of the larger Zo, the problem lies with the language, you do not understand their languages – so much for different dialects!

Can we not co-exist peacefully without you guys trying to impose your name to us just to pump your ego and adrenaline?

Also know that Zomis include – Teddim, Sizang, Paite, etc Tiddim, Tonzang and its surrounding areas – few people among a larger family, likewise Laimi include Hakha, Thlantlang and the surrounding areas, likewise there are smaller ones like Senthang, Mara, Lautu, K’cho, Asho, Thado, etc who live in a clear demarcated areas.

And read the following, if you don’t udnerstand Mizo language, request someone to translate for you:

Quote from Khampat.com

Mizo vek unau vek kan ni tih vel hi chu khawvel a awm chhung chuan tuman an pawm kim theih hi ka ring hlawl lo

Paihte[Zomi] Mizoram a piang leh sei lian ka ni a, Mizo vek kan ni tih rilru hi ka piantirh a ta ka lo ngaih ve dan thin a nia….hun a kal zel a, thilte ka han ngaihtuah ve theih deuh takah hian Mizo hi ka inti thei ta hlawl lo mai……why???

School kan kal lai chuan classah Niangi, Dimi, Luni, Munga leh Pauate, kan pi leh puten hmangaihna nen a min phuah kan hmingte chu fiamthu thawh nan an han hmang fo thin, a NA a ni e….nuih a za duh lo khawp mai…an ni ai a lehkha ka thiam zawk vang pawh a ni mahna…..mipa naupang hawi herh ho sawi chauh chu ni sela la ziaawm….zirtirtu pa pui pui nu pui pui ten an la uar zawk sauh a…..think about it……… Burma mi Mizorama kan hmusit em em tam tak hi ka chipuite[Paihte] an ni…Mizo ho in paihte paihte nghapih tia hmusit tak a an koh ri ka hriat chang hian ka rilru hi a na takzet a, Mizo nih hi ka duh hlawl lo a, ka dam chhung in Mizo ka inti lovang hrethiams people….sometime we need to ask ourselves why people don’t wanna call themselves Mizo. THERE IS MORE THAN 20 GOOD REASONS NOT TO CALL OURSELVES MIZO

BTW Mizo hi hnam hming a ni lo tihte hi lo hre ve mai mai ula….trawng hming a ni e….Ironically in chapo inlak san ang hu in ho….pawnah chuan millionaire fa ang mai a inchei innah chuan eitur pawh nei lo….lololol….chu ai chuan Burma ram a tang a nu leh pa chawm tur a MIZO ho hmusit leh tih duhdah tuar a rawn zinchho ka chipuite hi ka chhuang a, Lalpan malsawm mawlh rawh se AMEN….an ke phahte hlaiin, trawp in thring hle mahse ka tan chuan ka unau hnai ber leh unau diktak zawkte an ni si a.

Written by Zolianu

Source: Khampat.com

Comment from martin
Time: May 27, 2009, 10:40 am

Dear Steven,

There are only two groups. Zo and Chin. And it is clearly divided. No middle ground. As a Zo i don’t fancy slave terms such as Kuki or Chin. ” Great !!!!!!!, Burmese call you Chin and see you got a name now Cheers Steven, Good For you, might as well as call the Burmese your DADDY, kiss his ass and thz him for naming you, but don’t forget to ask what it means, cause u gonna have to tell your friends, BASKET.”.

For us we sort of got the first ladder up the education thing so we do know what is Smart and Pride and we try to keep that Cool and Intact. We can’t look over everyone. A tree still stands but there can be falling leaves. no harms meant. early education= early knowledge = early common sense = early adoption of ZO = National UNITY. This equation clearly is true for what is happening with Hakha-Thantland and it’s surroundings. you see MAGIC :D , the non-hakha-thantlang famlies now are really EDUCATED and they have real KNOWLEDGE and they now think with common sense resulting knowing that they are not Lai which they might have thought they were.:D Magic

It might be difficult to argue about 20 good reasons. It seems Lusie wants Mizo=lusei=duhlian which is for me equals to Hakha TRASH. Zo / CHO/ SHO is an identity NOT LANGUAGE.

Smarty, you can start encouraging the SLAVE NAIVE TERM CHIN, to ur brothers, maybe by first trying to find the meaning and it’s historical facts( IF there was suppose to be one??)Oh i forgot, call Lian Mung sakong or Lian Uk, i am pretty sure they got PILES OF SHIT for that, ex he would say I Think Man are from Mars because the same M and A. I think Chin is Jin because we like to eat Gin. u have lots of Smarty friends. They are really sucessing transporting the whole hakha and thantlang peopleto US AUS and many others, using the CHIN TERM. that is why they like CHin:D they had to not that they want to or belive in.:D

CHeers man
martin

Comment from Steven
Time: May 27, 2009, 9:42 pm

Hi Martin, first of all, understand that Mara people do not subscribe to the names imposed on them by outsiders whether Zo or Chin.

You said, “There are only two groups. Zo and Chin. And it is clearly divided. No middle ground. As a Zo i don’t fancy slave terms such as Kuki or Chin. ”

As a Mara guy, I don’t fancy Zo nor Chin either. Specially by claiming Maras as Zo we have more things to lose than to gain.

First of all we do not understand Zo (Paite/Teddim) language so much to claim our identity as Zo.

Secondly, it is unrecognized name proposed by some scholars. This name will never be accepted by many of our people in the North and in the South.

Maras do not claim themselves as Chin either. But for practical purpose, as it advances our claims of human rights around the world – this name is being in used instead of Mara, Laimi, Zomi, Zo, K’Cho, Asho, etc. More than that Chin bears no meaning to us. So, stop saying we love the name. Do you love that you are also called a Burmese? I don’t think so. But the fact is you are one. No matter how proud and boastful you may be. Somtimes, circumstances put us where we do not wish to be.

What you guys are doing is not really good. You separate yourselves from your brothers by calling yourselves Zo and do not mix anymore with others. If a Mara, Senthang, K’Cho, Laimi, etc, started doing the same thing even before we can influence the world with our rightful claims, what good it is? This is what you are doing. It is not good. Whether we agree on one specific name is not the first priority…. remember you are only fooling yourselves… like you and me who have come out from Chin state are a little too brave the way we write our comments on the internet. Don’t you think?

There’s nothing to cheer about!

Comment from Sivasish Biswas
Time: May 27, 2009, 11:20 pm

The interaction between Stephen and Martin is getting hot…I’m learning or rather re-learning the Mizo situation as fraught with sub-texts. would love to know more about who are the Lais and Maras and what makes them different to Mizos?

Comment from martin
Time: May 28, 2009, 5:48 am

Dear steven,

you are not a mara.

Comment from Steven
Time: May 28, 2009, 7:25 am

Dear Martin, You are not a Zo, does that make you happy?

Comment from Steven
Time: May 28, 2009, 5:00 pm

Hi Sivasish Biswas, do recognize the difference between Zo and Mizo especially in Martin’s context. Kuki-Chin-Mizo which includes dozens of people group who trace back their root to a cave in modern day China speak different languages and dialects today which they don’t understand one another. Some are intelligible but some are not. Kuki-Chin-Mizo people as a whole agree that they are one but have not been able to come up with a common name unlike Nagas who have agreed to use Naga as their common name.

In the above discussion, Martin is promoting Zo as our common name, in fact, Kuki-Chin-Mizo people in Mizoram call themselves by three names, Mizo, Lai and Mara mainly according to the language they speak that leaves out Chakmas as non-Kuki-Chin-Mizo people.

Zo may sound like Mizo but the context in which Martin is speaking right now is actually a few thousand people in CHin State who calls themselves Zou or Zo. The language of Zo is not understood by or familiar with Lais, Maras, Senthang, K’Cho, Thado, Lautu, etc people who also trace their root to be the same.

Mizo is a term which has evolved much in the past few decades. Earlier Lusei (Lushai) speaking people speak Duhlian language which became very popular. Later on it overtakes many other smaller dialects or languages in the region including Fanai, Ralte, etc, especially within modern day Mizoram. That Duhlian language is now known as Mizo. If one wants to learn Mizo language in schools, colleges and University, they will learn Duhlian language as Mizo. It means that Duhlian language has evolved to become Mizo language.

However, many feel that Mizo is a common name covering all Kuki-Chin-Mizo people living in Mizoram and even beyond. If that is the case, Mizo language cannot be just Duhlian language which is taught in schools as Mizo language. The reality is that Duhlian = Mizo. Over 12,000 who speak the same Duhlian (Mizo) language live in Chin State, Myanmar.

Lais and Maras are closely related people but have evolved in time to speak a very different languages. They live in Southern part of Mizoram, both have an Autonomous District Councils to look after the affairs of their people. More than 70% (over 2 lakh, 1997) Lais live in Chin State, Burma, the people in Hakha, Thlantlang and its surrounding areas speak the same language as people in Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC) in Mizoram.

Likewise, half of the Mara people also live in Chin state, Burma, (around 40,000, 2007).

Martin’s Zo are people who live north of Lais and Mara people in Chin State. Few of them are also found in Mizoram where they are scattered.

Martin is simply trying to exploit the emotion of our people by asserting the name Zo which will please majority Mizos in India who speak Duhlian language and Zomis in Myanmar who speak Paite or Teddim language. Remember, therefore, Zomi language and Mizo language are very different also. What he is really trying is to promote Zo or Zou, they number a little over 10,000 people in Chin state who speak a language different from Mizo, Mara, Lai, and many other languages of Kuki-Chin-Mizo people.

The problem with Kuki-Chin-Mizo people is not accepting our differences and diversity among our people. Instead we are trying to assimilate or are trying to impose the best name we could come up to our brothers. Thado people will never accept that they are Zomi, likewise, Zomis will never accept that they are Mara, Senthang people will not accept that they are Thado, K’cho people will not accept that they are Vaiphei, etc. There are people who squabble over Mizo and Zomi. Duhlian speaking people use Mizo, while Paite/Teddim speaking people use Zomi and the languages are different too.

This is a never ending debate which many of us are not willing to speak as it can become very communal and hurtful.

Thanks for asking Sivasish.

Comment from Martin
Time: May 30, 2009, 10:03 pm

Dear Steven,

i meant that i think you are not from a mara community but from hakha community.

cheers
martin

Comment from Martin
Time: May 30, 2009, 10:32 pm

Dear Steven,

you have made simple things a lot complicated.

1) I can’t remember where i used the Zou term here? Since you manage to put that in the conversation i just have to ask you that. don’t try to complicate or manipulate things just because your head is manipulated.

2) Grow up ! a cave in China? who told you that? Did God came down from heaven and told you that? Grow up man !you can do
better than that. Thousands of a SHO villages in west of irrawaddy river. you can find that in books, unlike you God didn’t gave me any vision about ur CAVE. you are a real DONUT. seriously Grow up.

3) Hakha and Thantalng languages are not the same with surrounding languages. And there are not 2 lakkhs Lai in Chin State. That is the easiest thing to prove in all the half rubbish steve context. Steven, Try tell that to someone from Burma. try that.hakha and thangtlang are only around 60000 and the rest such as zotung, zophei, senthang, and many others including the falams are not LAI. they don’t bend in that LAI term. Steven, are u the representative of the these people since you are saying these kind of things. your own mara ( u said u are mara, unbelievable, and i don’t think) guys are saying Lai is only hakha and thangtlang.
- Dear Steven don’t be so sad with your metality. i want to encourage you that where i live in Burma, surrounding families of hakha and thantalng does not speak LAI and does not understand Lai and are not the same. Don’t feel sad when people know that you are lying, Steven at least you tried. Zotung will speak for himself as zophei and senthang and other will. Falam even don’t like to call themselves lai anymore. Don’t be sad steven you still have friends Lian Uk and Lian mung Sakong.

3) ZO/YO/miZO/ZOmi/a SHO/ CHO are the same thing with different tones. Lais are subordinates of Lai chief such as in thedim areas Guite and Kamhau terms were. Long time ago people in these areas use to address themselves as subordinates of Guite or Kamhau chiefs but sadly in hakha and thangtlang areas these things are still popular.

4) Common language is essential. there are options. Choose the language that most can speak or make a new language combining all other languages. AT LEAST, steven try to think about one common language. when u do that u will understand that when u really want it there is always the best option and duhlien is the best one here. you don’t have to agree with me steven, cause you are just one person. when u really want one you look for the best option. you are not helping anyone not even yourselves.

5) you are confusing people by using terms like you want to or you wish to. Who is talking about Thado and Cho never accepting Vaiphei??you said that so i need to ask you. where did that rubbish came? from your head? Thado people will never accpet they are Zomi? their elders do not but the ordinaries are fond of Mizo as ordinary hakha and thangtlang and falam are fond of Mizo

6) you are proving to me that you are not MARA but Hakha.
Dear Steven what you have mentioned above are one of the easiest and childish mistakes you would not want to make or wright. It is the same as reading a Lai Book.

Dear steven, i am really amazed about you. where do u live? are u sure you are from Burma? because i am 2 and what you have written was you intentionally complicate things with thado, vaiphei, Zou and Chou. where did that all come from? all of these guys accept they are ZO or at east they are fond of them.
Lais are 2 lakhs?? give your head a break. if lucky 60000.

STEVEN you are a LIER like lian maung sakhong and lian uk
Steven you are a deceiver like most hakha elders are
Steven you write what you think not on practical facts.

i have given up since i find you really BULLSHIT. It is difficult to see any convinable

Comment from Martin
Time: May 30, 2009, 10:56 pm

Dear Sivasish,

If you are really interested there are books i would like to recommend for reading. Zo history by Vumson suantak and Chin Identity book review by Vumson Suantak. If you like history, just enjoy it. After that try to read Chin Identity by lian mung sakhong. Well after reading those you will see two different rules. At least you will get the idea.

Man..i have really given up to Steven. he is way too much for me.
Steven you are the MAN……full of bullshit and hakha political ideology.

cheers
martin

Comment from Martin
Time: May 30, 2009, 11:05 pm

Dear steven

just a joke

Let’s say you have a food store and the food you are selling is like the things you have written. No one will buy your shit. Offcourse, ur buddies lian mung sakong and lian Uk will always be there for you.:D since you are form of slave terms such as CHIN(burmese term) and Lai (subordinates of lai chiefs).

Comment from Steven
Time: May 31, 2009, 12:48 am

Dear Martin,

Make some sense bro. Medicines are like shits, take it and live or reject it and live pathetically.

No one embrace your view except some Zo/mi-s and their affiliates. I am no fan of Pu Lian Sakhong and Pu Lian Uk, we heard that the latter one fiercely argued with Mara scholars in the recent concluded seminar in Aizawl. But I respect them as scholars and leaders in their own right. Both of them are Zophei to set the record straight. You have no clues what you are speaking about. Zophei people are those who stand between Lais and Maras, their language is a mixture of Lai and Mara.

Look below to know:
English – Thank you very much.
Lai – Ka lawm tuk.
Zophei – Ka chalawng nge tie.
Mara – Ei chaly ngai ta.

Think critically and don’t just shout Zo a million times, no one will listen to you. We are diverse and we must respect one another first before we can speak about what makes sense.

Martin, Ka chalawng nge tie…

Comment from lian
Time: August 7, 2009, 2:42 pm

Dear Friends, I’m from Chin State of Burma. You have so much discussed about the past, present , and future. I am very glad and happy to read your arguments. As far as my reading and observation is concerned I can never and will not never accept the arguments made by martin. The reason why i can’t accept is that he is too much thinking about the zo people. Therefore, I rather accept who can bring peace, unity, and love for the society as a whole. But Martin, your too much confined only on Zo. Please be aware of that.

Thanks

Comment from RTPA
Time: August 7, 2009, 6:51 pm

Van ngaihnawm ve aw… beng var thlak khop mai… Tran lam ka nei lo…

Comment from Marapasaw Dopa
Time: August 9, 2009, 10:40 pm

I propose “Union of Hill Nations” (UHN) as our common name and English as our common language for all the Chin-Kuki-Lushai-Zo-Zomi-Mara-Paite-Lai-Thado-Vaiphei-Bawm-Matu-Zotung-Zophei-Khami-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-groups.

Comment from Steven
Time: August 12, 2009, 4:01 am

Maramizodiktak Says:
June 29th, 2008 at 10:48 pm

Zohnathlakte in pumkhat kan duh chuan Myanmar a awm Zohnathlak hovin neutral term “Chin” an hmang ang hian, India rama awm Zohnathlakte pawhin neutral term something like “Union of Hill Kingdoms” (UHK) te hmang mai ila, Duhlian speakers ho hi Mizo in ti bik tawh se la, Paite (Tiddim) ho hi Zomi in ti ta se la, adang zawn an in ko duh ang theuch vin – Hmar, Gante, Biate, Lai, Mara, etc, ni hlawm se la, ti chuan heng Zohnathlak ho hian, Union of Hill Kingdoms chu din ho ta i la, kan in pumkhat thei zawk mai thei.

Source: Misual.com

Comment from R.L.Chhanhima
Time: September 3, 2009, 3:33 pm

Mizo hi chhui chhui mah ula, khawi ah mah in chhui chhuak lo ang. Zo emaw zhou emaw tih zul hi kan zawng hrim hrim anih chuan China ram chauh loah pawh European ho tawng emaw berah chuan a awm ngei ang. Ni e, mizo a kan buaina ber hi chu tawng chungchangah hian a ni e. Kan hnam hi a insiam tha meka Mizoram chhunga Mizo te hi Mizo ah hian kan chian vek hun ala awm ngei ka beisei, rilru tha tak kan put vek theih chuan. Mizo hnam hrim hrim zawng ila khawiah mah hmuh tur an awm lo. He Mizoram chhunga cheng hnam inuna ho hi Mizo chu kan ni e. Mizo hian unau a nei lo a, amaherawhchu Ralte ka nihna anga ka unau te chu Hmar te, Lai te, Mara te, Paihte te, Kuki te hi an ni mai. Inti mizo bik ho hi chu rilru te nuihzat tlak an ni e.

Comment from NIRDESH
Time: October 15, 2009, 10:42 am

I m 22 year old i love mizo girl she is so beauti ful for me

Comment from Diktea
Time: January 15, 2010, 3:03 pm

correct, its difficult to find the real root of the mizos. some claim themselves to be the lost tribe of israel too. no clear proof.

Dear Steven,
acc to me, Paite are mizo. if you see the history we see the main so called mizos (Sailo) are the offspring of Paite. Mizo ka inti tlat asin.

Comment from lala
Time: April 15, 2010, 11:50 am

in van ho mai mai e awwwwwwwww, buai na leh harsat na in tawh lai ber in khawiah nge in tlanchhiat thin, hetiang zawng a inhnial vak vak hi a productive lo em mai, a kaw tawp a mizoram rawn pan leh tho tur hi chu mizo in tih ve mai tur

Comment from lala
Time: April 15, 2010, 11:54 am

e chuan taka, tawngkam bawlhhlawh hi kan hriat ve nel nual avang hian hman vak kher hi a mawi lem lo, tawng thiam leh thiam lo teh na pawh a tling zo lo e